Healthcare Reform ≠ Public Health Reform: On Pathogens, Poverty, and Prevention
نویسنده
چکیده
Few would deny the contentiousness of the ongoing healthcare reform debate in the United States. Referencing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111–148), a recent article in Foreign Affairs noted that ‘‘no U.S. law has been more passionately opposed by Republicans.’’ Unsuccessful efforts to replace or repeal the Act keep coming, proposed and then voted down or withdrawn during both the Obama and Trump administrations. We all have witnessed this drama play out in Washington for nearly a decade by now. Yet a mistaken notion persists, seen in news stories and op-ed pieces from both sides of the political aisle, that this has been a national debate about public health and the reform of the institutional public health system in the United States. As has been noted elsewhere, no such debate has occurred. The recent legislation, moreover, ‘‘does not take a public health approach to addressing deficiencies in the United States health system or challenge the decades-long medicalization of health with a population-based approach’’ (p. 341). This misunderstanding is rooted in widespread misunderstanding of what public health is, especially in an underappreciation that invoking the phrase ‘‘public health’’ connotes something quite distinct from ‘‘healthcare’’ or ‘‘medicine.’’ The latest edition of the authoritative A Dictionary of Epidemiology defines public health as the ‘‘specific policies, services, programs and other essential efforts agreed (ideally, and often, democratically), organized, structured, financed, monitored, and evaluated by society to collectively protect, promote, and restore the people’s health and its determinants’’ (p. 230). This includes the work of ‘‘institutions, public and private organizations,’’ and ‘‘scientific disciplines and professions’’ all of whom labor to ‘‘prevent disease and disability, prolong life, and promote health through the organized and collective efforts of society.’’ So while healthcare is a component of the public health enterprise, it is only one aspect of a multifactorial effort aimed at supporting the health of individuals and the public at large. A special emphasis of such efforts, as indicated by the mission of the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service, is supporting efforts directed ‘‘to underserved and vulnerable populations.’’ These main points define the mission of the public health sector.
منابع مشابه
Remote Hospital Reform in the Context of Australian Health Care Reforms
Public hospitals play an important role in the delivery of essential healthcare in Australia as in many countries. The Australian Government has in the recent years implemented national healthcare reform to improve the performance of and access to public hospital services. This reform extends to all public hospitals including remote hospitals. However, there is limited information on how reform...
متن کاملDoes the Accountable Care Act Aim to Promote Quality, Health, and Control Costs or Has It Missed the Mark? ;Comment on “Health System Reform in the United States”
McDonough’s perspective on healthcare reform in the US provides a clear, coherent analysis of the mix of access and delivery reforms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) aka Obamacare. As noted by McDonough, this major reform bill is designed to expand access for health coverage that includes both prevention and treatment benefits among uninsured Americans. Additionally, this legislation includes s...
متن کاملRecent Iranian Health System Reform: An Operational Perspective to Improve Health Services Quality
The operational management of healthcare services is expected to directly touch patient experiences. Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) for the first time, as such, has sought to improve the operational management of healthcare delivery within a reform agenda by setting benchmarks for ‘number of visit per hour’ and waiting time in outpatient clinics of about 700 affiliated...
متن کاملPolicy Capacity for Health Reform: Necessary but Insufficient; Comment on “Health Reform Requires Policy Capacity”
Forest and colleagues have persuasively made the case that policy capacity is a fundamental prerequisite to health reform. They offer a comprehensive life-cycle definition of policy capacity and stress that it involves much more than problem identification and option development. I would like to offer a Canadian perspective. If we define health reform as re-orienting the health system from acut...
متن کاملUnpacking “Health Reform” and “Policy Capacity”; Comment on “Health Reform Requires Policy Capacity”
Health reform is the outcome of dispersed policy initiatives in different sectors, at different levels and across time. Policy work which can drive coherent health reform needs to operate across the governance structures as well as the institutions that comprise healthcare systems. Building policy capacity to support health reform calls for clarity regarding the nature of such policy work and t...
متن کامل